Posted on August 1, 2022
† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P value away from Wald statistic to check on getting a total perception of categorical BI-RADS density. All statistical tests were a couple-sided.
Whether or not BI-RADS occurrence didn’t modify threat of breast cancer death into the link to most other pathological items, girls with BI-RADS step 1 thickness tended to have the highest chance, in almost any stratum
¶ AJCC phase is included as the a great categorical covariate in models having all level mutual, having and you will in place of stage IV.
Survival model outcomes for new family members anywhere between mammographic thickness and you may chance from breast cancer dying, overall and also by AJCC stage*
* AJCC = American Mutual Committee to the Cancer tumors; BI-RADS = Nipple Imaging Reporting and you may Studies System; Bmi = bmi; CI = believe period; Hour = threat proportion. Letter = 96 women omitted on the end in-specific models.
† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without datingranking.net/pl/hiki-recenzja BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P value out-of Wald figure to test getting a total feeling out-of categorical BI-RADS density. Most of the analytical testing was two-sided.
Though BI-RADS thickness don’t modify chance of cancer of the breast dying into the link to other pathological points, female that have BI-RADS step one thickness had a tendency to have the higher exposure, in any stratum
¶ AJCC stage is included due to the fact a categorical covariate into the habits having all the degree mutual, having and you can rather than stage IV.
One of girls having tumors with a minimum of dos.0cm, BI-RADS step 1 thickness was in the a heightened risk of breast disease demise (Hour = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.14 to dos.09; P = .003 having complete aftereffect of BI-RADS occurrence; Dining table 4). Women who had each other BI-RADS step one density and you may higher-degree cancers had a heightened danger of breast cancer passing (Hr = step 1.45, 95% CI = step 1.05 in order to 2.02; P = .13 to own overall effectation of density).
Emergency design results for the latest family between mammographic thickness and chance out of cancer of the breast passing, stratified because of the tumor services, AJCC stages I–IV combined*
* N = 96 women excluded from cause-specific models. Fully adjusted model includes covariates for AJCC stage (I, IIA, IIB, III, IV), registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), body mass index (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded. AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer; BI-RADS = Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; CI = confidence interval; ER = estrogen receptor; HR = hazard ratio; PR = progesterone receptor.